From course to project

Delivering an AI programme

The course gave you the frameworks. This is what they look like on a real programme, with real systems, real data and a board waiting for results.

Phases and gates

Four phases, three gates

Each gate is a short list of things that must be true. If they aren't, you don't pass, however good the demo looked.

  1. 2–4 weeks

    Discover

    Frame the problem, measure today, find the data, name the owner, and test the riskiest assumption on real data.

  2. Gate · must be true to passBaseline agreed, data access confirmed, DPIA started, compliance involved.

  3. 6–8 weeks

    Pilot

    One process, in shadow mode: the AI recommends, people still decide, and the two are compared.

  4. Gate · must be true to passAccuracy on your own cases within agreed limits; no customer group worse off; compliance sign-off.

  5. Go-live

    Production

    Monitoring, support, rollback and training in place before the switch, not after.

  6. Gate · must be true to passRun cost and quality stable for a full month.

  7. Ongoing

    Scale

    More cases and more teams, reusing the same pattern and the same gates.

The business case

What a business case for AI needs

Most of this is the same as any business case. The last three items are where AI cases usually fall short.

  1. The process, the volumes and today's cost: measured, not estimated.
  2. Two or three measures of success, each with a baseline and an example target.
  3. What changes for people: roles, training, and who signs off what.
  4. The data: where it lives, who owns it, and whether you're allowed to use it for this.
  5. The cost to run each month after go-live, not just the cost to build.
  6. The rules that apply, and a DPIA started before the pilot.
  7. What you'll do if it doesn't work: the stop criteria and the fallback.

Roles

A generic RACI

Adapt the roles to your organisation. The tagged columns are the roles I can fill.

Who is responsible, accountable, consulted and informed, by activity
ActivityBusiness ownerProgramme managerProduct ownerSolutions architectI can fill thisTechnical PMI can fill thisEngineersI can fill thisData protection officerSecurityI can fill thisService owner
Business case and benefitsAccountableResponsibleResponsibleConsultedConsultedNot involvedConsultedNot involvedConsulted
Target architectureInformedConsultedConsultedAccountable and ResponsibleConsultedConsultedConsultedConsultedConsulted
DPIA and regulatory reviewAccountableConsultedConsultedConsultedInformedNot involvedResponsibleConsultedInformed
Build and integrationInformedConsultedConsultedAccountableResponsibleResponsibleInformedConsultedConsulted
Evaluation on your own casesInformedInformedAccountableResponsibleConsultedResponsibleConsultedNot involvedConsulted
Go-live decisionAccountableResponsibleConsultedConsultedResponsibleInformedConsultedConsultedConsulted
Run, monitor and improveInformedInformedConsultedConsultedConsultedResponsibleConsultedConsultedAccountable

Business case and benefits

Business owner
A · Accountable
Programme manager
R · Responsible
Product owner
R · Responsible
Solutions architect
C · Consulted
Technical PM
C · Consulted
Data protection officer
C · Consulted
Service owner
C · Consulted

Target architecture

Business owner
I · Informed
Programme manager
C · Consulted
Product owner
C · Consulted
Solutions architect
A/R · Accountable and Responsible
Technical PM
C · Consulted
Engineers
C · Consulted
Data protection officer
C · Consulted
Security
C · Consulted
Service owner
C · Consulted

DPIA and regulatory review

Business owner
A · Accountable
Programme manager
C · Consulted
Product owner
C · Consulted
Solutions architect
C · Consulted
Technical PM
I · Informed
Data protection officer
R · Responsible
Security
C · Consulted
Service owner
I · Informed

Build and integration

Business owner
I · Informed
Programme manager
C · Consulted
Product owner
C · Consulted
Solutions architect
A · Accountable
Technical PM
R · Responsible
Engineers
R · Responsible
Data protection officer
I · Informed
Security
C · Consulted
Service owner
C · Consulted

Evaluation on your own cases

Business owner
I · Informed
Programme manager
I · Informed
Product owner
A · Accountable
Solutions architect
R · Responsible
Technical PM
C · Consulted
Engineers
R · Responsible
Data protection officer
C · Consulted
Service owner
C · Consulted

Go-live decision

Business owner
A · Accountable
Programme manager
R · Responsible
Product owner
C · Consulted
Solutions architect
C · Consulted
Technical PM
R · Responsible
Engineers
I · Informed
Data protection officer
C · Consulted
Security
C · Consulted
Service owner
C · Consulted

Run, monitor and improve

Business owner
I · Informed
Programme manager
I · Informed
Product owner
C · Consulted
Solutions architect
C · Consulted
Technical PM
C · Consulted
Engineers
R · Responsible
Data protection officer
C · Consulted
Security
C · Consulted
Service owner
A · Accountable

R ResponsibleA AccountableC ConsultedI Informed· not involved

Sound familiar?

Where real projects differ from the course

None of these are in the textbook. All of them are in most programmes.

The data is in six systems, and two of them are spreadsheets.

Courses assume clean, available data. Real programmes spend their first month finding it, and their second getting permission to use it.

The pilot worked. Production is a different problem.

Demos skip the API layer, the queue, the monitoring and the support rota. That's where most of the effort actually goes.

Compliance joined in month five.

The DPIA and your regulator's rules shape the design. Bring them in at the first gate, not the last.

Nobody owns it after go-live.

Prompts, evaluation sets and models drift. Without a named owner, quality falls quietly until someone complains.

For coursework

Where to find it in a playbook

Every playbook uses the same sections, so you can compare them. This is where each part of a typical course assignment lives.

Business case

Every playbook's The business problem section.

Benefits and KPIs

Every playbook's How success is measured section.

Stakeholders and compliance

Every playbook's UK regulation and controls section.

Solution design

Every playbook's The solution, and components side by side section.

Operating model

Every playbook's Process and people section.

Phases and gates

Every playbook's Delivery plan section.

Roles and responsibilities

Every playbook's Roles and RACI section.

Risks and issues

Every playbook's Where this goes wrong section.

For students

Studying for an AI certificate?

Use these playbooks as worked examples. Each one has the business case, measures of success, risks and RACI your coursework asks for. I hold a Leadership with AI certificate myself, so I know what the courses cover, and where real projects differ.

Browse the playbooks →

Want a second pair of eyes on the plan?

Delivering an AI programme and want someone to test the phases, gates and roles before you commit? Let's talk it through.

Sam Naseem
Sam NaseemBirmingham, UK · UK & Europe
Available now