Financial services · Playbook 01

I've worked in this sector

KYC and customer onboarding

Every application read, checked and summarised before an analyst opens it. Analysts spend their time on judgement, not copying, and a person approves or declines every customer.

  • Document AI
  • Agents with tools
  • Human in the loop
  • Event-driven integration
  • Money Laundering Regulations 2017
  • JMLSG guidance
  • FCA SYSC
  • UK sanctions
  • Companies House
  • UK GDPR

At a glance

The problem
Analysts read IDs, statements and company papers, run the same checks in four systems, then write it all up by hand
Typical volume
Around 1,500 new retail and small-business applications a week, plus 2,000 periodic reviews a month
Who's involved
Onboarding operations, financial crime and the MLRO, compliance, data protection, IT, the screening and identity suppliers
Pilot
8–10 weeks after a 3–4 week discovery
Platforms
AWS, Azure, or a sovereign or on-prem stack

An illustrative scenario. The numbers are typical examples, not a client case study. The cloud services and UK rules were checked on 9 November 2026.

The business problem

A retail customer applies in the app and uploads a passport and a utility bill. A small-business customer sends a certificate of incorporation, a shareholder list, two directors' IDs and three months of bank statements. Before anyone can decide, an analyst has to read every document, check it against the application, run sanctions and PEP screening, look the company up at Companies House, work out who really owns it, and write a risk assessment that will stand up to an audit.

In a typical mid-sized lender, that work takes 20 to 40 minutes for a simple retail case and two to four hours for a small business with layered ownership. Most of it is gathering and copying, not judgement. Screening alerts are mostly false matches on common names, but each one still needs clearing and a note. Periodic reviews pile up behind new business, so higher-risk customers go longer between checks than the policy says.

The rules have also moved. Amendments to the Money Laundering Regulations took effect on 30 June 2026. The OFSI Consolidated List closed on 28 January 2026, so screening has to run against the FCDO's UK Sanctions List. Companies House now requires directors and people with significant control to verify their identity. Any change to onboarding has to keep the firm's risk-based approach clear, evidenced and owned by named people.

What AI changes

  • Every document is read and its details extracted within minutes, then checked against the application: names, dates of birth, addresses, company numbers and officers.
  • Identity is verified through a certified digital verification service on the government's DVS register, with the result and its certification recorded on the file.
  • Sanctions, PEP and adverse media hits arrive with the evidence for and against a true match laid out, so analysts clear false positives in seconds and spend time on the real ones.
  • For small businesses, the Companies House record, the officers and the ownership chain are pulled together, and any discrepancy with what the customer told you is highlighted.
  • A draft risk assessment and source-of-funds summary is waiting in the analyst's queue, with every statement linked to the document it came from.
  • People stay in control: the AI never approves or declines a customer, never files a suspicious activity report, and never tells a customer why a case is on hold.

How success is measured

Agree these, and measure the baseline, before anything is built. Example targets are typical, not promises.

Time to decision

How long a customer waits from complete application to an answer, split by retail and small business.

ExampleRetail same day; small business within 3 days

Analyst time per case

Time moved from gathering and copying to judgement.

ExampleDown by half

Screening alerts cleared per hour

False matches closed with a recorded reason, without lowering the screening threshold.

ExampleDoubled, threshold unchanged

Draft acceptance and override rate

How often analysts change the risk rating or the summary. Very high means it isn't helping; near zero can mean drafts are being signed unread.

ExampleStable, and sampled weekly by QA

Periodic reviews on time

Reviews completed by the date the customer's risk rating requires.

ExampleAbove 98%, high risk first

Quality assurance findings

Errors found by first- and second-line QA, and by internal audit, in AI-assisted files against manual ones.

ExampleNo worse than manual, then falling

UK regulation and controls

Cross-sector rules are on the UK regulation map.

  • HM Treasury / FCAMoney Laundering Regulations 2017, as amended (most 2026 amendments in force 30 June 2026)

    Customer due diligence, beneficial ownership, enhanced due diligence and ongoing monitoring stay the firm's duty. The 2026 amendments narrowed mandatory country-based EDD to the FATF 'black list' and made EDD apply to unusually complex or unusually large transactions. Rules like these change, so they live in a versioned rule set owned by financial crime, not in a prompt. Data collected for KYC is used only for anti-money laundering purposes.

  • JMLSGGuidance for the UK financial sector (Parts I and II)

    The analyst's checklist and the agent's tasks follow the firm's JMLSG-based procedures. The agent drafts against them and cites them. Revised Part I paragraphs were sent to HM Treasury for approval in 2026, so the knowledge base is versioned and re-tested when guidance changes.

  • FCASYSC 6.3 and SM&CR

    Financial crime systems and controls must be proportionate and documented, and the MLRO (SMF17) is accountable. The design gives the MLRO a clear view of what the AI does, what it can't do, and how its quality is measured. The AI never files a suspicious activity report and never drafts anything that could tip off a customer.

  • FCDO / OFSIUK Sanctions List

    Since 28 January 2026, the UK Sanctions List is the only source for UK designations, and new designations carry only a Unique ID. Screening runs in the existing engine against that list. The AI helps clear alerts by setting out the evidence; a person confirms or escalates every possible match.

  • Companies HouseEconomic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023

    Directors and PSCs must verify their identity, with the transition for existing companies running to mid-November 2026. The register is a useful source, but the firm can't rely on it alone to verify beneficial ownership. Material discrepancies the analyst confirms are reported to Companies House by a person.

  • DCMS (OfDIA)UK digital verification services trust framework

    Since February 2026, government guidance says certified services on the DVS register can be used for the identity verification step of customer due diligence. Choose a certified provider, record its certification on each file, and keep the rest of CDD, risk assessment and monitoring in-house.

  • Home OfficeFailure to prevent fraud (in force 1 September 2025)

    Large organisations need reasonable procedures to stop associates committing fraud for the firm's benefit. Onboarding targets and incentives, and the suppliers who run parts of the process, belong in that fraud risk assessment.

  • ICOUK GDPR, the Data Protection Act 2018 and automated decisions

    ID documents and selfie checks involve biometric data. That means a DPIA before the pilot, UK processing, clear retention set by the MLR record-keeping rules, and contracts that stop providers training on your data. Since 5 February 2026, solely automated significant decisions need safeguards, and a person makes every decline or exit decision here.

  • HM TreasuryPayment account termination rules (in force 28 April 2026)

    Closing a payment account after a periodic review now generally needs 90 days' notice with reasons the customer can understand, unless an AML or other legal exception applies. Exit decisions and their wording are made by people, with financial crime and legal input.

The solution

Showing AWSAzuresovereign / on-prem services. Switch with the toggle; every diagram and table on this page follows it.

KYC and customer onboarding: reference architecture
  1. 01Channels

    • Retail app and web application
    • Business banking application
    • Introducers and brokers
  2. 02Intake

    • API GatewayAPI ManagementKong, or your existing API gatewayAPI for applications
    • Amazon S3Blob StorageCeph, or IONOS S3 Object StorageDocument store
    • Certified identity provider (DVS register)
  3. 03Intelligence

    • Amazon TextractContent Understanding (Document Intelligence)Docling plus an open-weight vision modelRead documents
    • Bedrock Knowledge BasesFoundry IQ (Azure AI Search)OpenSearch, or PostgreSQL with pgvectorProcedures knowledge
    • Agent
      Bedrock AgentCoreFoundry Agent ServiceLangGraph on Kubernetes, with open-weight models via vLLMKYC file agent
    • Agent
      Bedrock AgentCoreFoundry Agent ServiceLangGraph on Kubernetes, with open-weight models via vLLMPeriodic review agent
  4. 04Orchestration

    • Step FunctionsLogic Apps / Durable FunctionsTemporalCase workflow
    • EventBridge + SQSEvent Grid + Service BusApache Kafka or RabbitMQEvents and queues
  5. 05Systems of record

    • Core banking and lending platform
    • Sanctions, PEP and adverse media screening
    • KYC case management and CRM
    • Companies House API
  6. 06People

    • Person
      Onboarding analyst: approve or refer
    • Person
      EDD and financial crime team
    • Person
      MLRO: suspicion and exits
  • Cloud or platform service (AWSAzuresovereign / on-prem)
  • AI agent
  • A person decides
  • Your existing systems
  • Outside your organisation

Components, side by side

KYC and customer onboarding: components on AWS, Azure and a sovereign or on-prem stack
LayerAWSAzureSovereign / on-prem
Intake: applications and documentsKeep the original upload unchanged, with a hash, for the MLR record-keeping period.API Gateway, S3API Management, Blob StorageKong or your existing API gateway; Ceph or IONOS S3 Object Storage
Identity verificationBuy this, don't build it. Check the provider is on the DVS register and record its certification on each file.A certified DVS provider, called through the API layerA certified DVS provider, called through the API layerA certified DVS provider, called through the API layer
Reading documentsTest on real uploads: phone photos of payslips, scanned share registers, statements from 30 different banks.Amazon TextractAzure Content Understanding (includes Document Intelligence)Open-source parsing (e.g. Docling) plus an open-weight vision model
Reasoning and draftingAWS and Azure both offer a choice of models, including Claude. On-prem and sovereign options run open-weight models.Amazon BedrockMicrosoft FoundryOpen-weight models served with vLLM on your own GPUs, or IONOS AI Model Hub
Procedures knowledge (retrieval)Your KYC procedures, risk methodology and JMLSG-based standards, versioned, so every draft cites the version it used.Bedrock Knowledge BasesFoundry IQ, built on Azure AI SearchOpenSearch, or PostgreSQL with pgvector
Agent runtimeThe original Bedrock Agents closed to new customers on 30 July 2026; new builds use AgentCore.Amazon Bedrock AgentCoreFoundry Agent ServiceAn open-source agent framework (e.g. LangGraph) on Kubernetes
ScreeningThe engine stays the control. Confirm it now sources the UK Sanctions List, not the closed OFSI list.Your existing screening engineYour existing screening engineYour existing screening engine
Company dataCache responses with the date fetched, so the file shows what the register said at the time.Companies House API through the API layerCompanies House API through the API layerCompanies House API through the API layer
Risk rulesRisk scoring stays deterministic and owned by financial crime. The model explains it; it doesn't set it.Your existing rules engine, or rules held as versioned configYour existing rules engine, or rules held as versioned configYour existing rules engine, or rules held as versioned config
Workflow and eventsStep Functions, EventBridge, SQSLogic Apps or Durable Functions, Event Grid, Service BusTemporal or n8n; Apache Kafka or RabbitMQ
Human reviewAnalysts review where they already work, not in a new screen.In the analysts' existing KYC case toolIn the analysts' existing KYC case toolIn the analysts' existing KYC case tool
GuardrailsBlock customer-facing wording about holds, suspicion or reasons for referral.Bedrock GuardrailsFoundry guardrails (Azure AI Content Safety)Open-source guardrails (e.g. NeMo Guardrails, Llama Guard)
Identity, keys, data protectionIAM Identity Center, KMS, MacieEntra ID, Key Vault, PurviewKeycloak or your existing Active Directory; OpenBao or HashiCorp Vault; an HSM
Monitoring and auditLog every source, draft, edit and decision, so a file can be replayed for QA, audit or the FCA.CloudWatch, CloudTrailAzure Monitor, Log AnalyticsPrometheus, Grafana, OpenTelemetry
UK data residencyIONOS AI Model Hub runs in German data centres: EU, not UK, residency.eu-west-2 (London)UK South / UK WestYour own UK data centre, or a UK or EU provider

On a phone, the table shows the platform you pick. Sovereign / on-prem means open, portable components you can run in your own data centre or with a UK or European provider; IONOS is shown as one example, and others exist. What sovereign cloud means →

Hybrid and on-prem

Many organisations keep core systems and sensitive data on their own servers. This is how the same design works across both.

Stays on-prem

Core banking, the screening engine and the KYC case tool stay where they are. Many lenders run these on their own servers or with a hosted core banking supplier, and nothing here needs them to move.

Uses cloud AI

Document reading, the procedures index and the two agents can run in AWS or Azure UK regions, or on your own GPUs with open-weight models if identity documents must stay in your estate.

How they connect

A private link (AWS Direct Connect or Azure ExpressRoute) and the API layer. Only the documents and fields the agent needs are sent, and drafts come back as events to the case tool.

If the link drops

Applications keep arriving and queue on your side. Analysts work cases manually, as they did before, and the backlog is drafted when the link returns.

The agents

What each agent may do through its tools, what it may not, and where a person signs off. The limits are enforced by the platform, not the prompt.

KYC file agent

May do

  • Read uploaded documents and extract their details
  • Request an identity check from the certified DVS provider
  • Look up the company, officers and PSCs at Companies House
  • Read screening results and set out the evidence for and against each match
  • Draft the risk assessment and source-of-funds summary, citing documents and procedures
  • Create a task, or request a missing document through the existing customer message template

May not do

  • Approve, decline or open an account
  • Clear or discount a screening alert
  • Change a risk rating set by the rules
  • File a suspicious activity report or a Companies House discrepancy report
  • Write free text to the customer

Where a person signs offAn analyst signs off every customer. EDD cases go to the financial crime team, and any suspicion goes to the MLRO. The agent's permissions are enforced by the platform's identity and policy controls, not by instructions in a prompt.

Periodic review agent

May do

  • Pick up customers due for review from the schedule
  • Compare the file with current screening, Companies House data and account activity
  • Draft a review summary listing what has changed and what hasn't
  • Queue the review for the right team by risk rating

May not do

  • Close or restrict an account
  • Raise or lower a risk rating
  • Contact the customer outside approved templates

Where a person signs offA person completes every review. Any restriction, exit or change of risk rating is a person's decision, made with financial crime and, for exits, legal input on notice and reasons.

Middleware and integration

Core banking, screening and the KYC case tool are reached only through the API layer. If you already run an integration platform, the agents use it like any other system does.

Each application becomes an event with a single ID. If the screening engine, the DVS provider or Companies House is slow or down, the case waits safely on the queue and is retried, and a retry never creates a second check or a second account.

External checks are recorded with what was asked, what came back and when. That evidence trail matters as much as the answer.

The AI can be switched off without stopping onboarding. If it's paused, cases go to analysts exactly as they did before.

Process and people

  • A clear split of duties: the rules set the risk rating, the agent drafts, the analyst decides, the MLRO owns suspicion.
  • An exception queue for documents the AI can't read with confidence, owned by a named team lead.
  • Override reasons captured whenever an analyst changes a draft or a rating, and reviewed weekly.
  • A named owner in financial crime for every procedure document, rule set and prompt, with change control.
  • First-line QA sampling AI-assisted files at a higher rate during the pilot, and second-line compliance testing before scale.
  • Analysts trained on what the AI doesn't check, and on tipping-off, before go-live.

Delivery plan

  1. 3–4 weeks

    Discovery

    Map today's retail and small-business journeys, measure the baseline, check access to screening, Companies House and the DVS provider, and pick the first journey.

  2. Gate · must be true to passBaseline agreed, MLRO and DPO involved, DPIA started, data access confirmed.

  3. 6–8 weeks

    Pilot

    Retail onboarding in shadow mode: the AI drafts, analysts work as normal, and QA compares the two.

  4. Gate · must be true to passDraft accuracy, alert-clearing quality and QA results within agreed limits, and MLRO sign-off.

  5. 4–6 weeks

    Production

    Drafts go live for retail, with monitoring, support and a rollback plan.

  6. Gate · must be true to passMonitoring, support, rollback plan and analyst training in place.

  7. Ongoing

    Scale

    Add small-business onboarding, then periodic reviews, one at a time.

  8. Gate · must be true to passEach new journey passes the same pilot gate, with second-line testing.

Roles and RACI

Who is responsible, accountable, consulted and informed, by activity
ActivityHead of financial crime / MLROProduct ownerSolutions architectI can fill thisTechnical PMI can fill thisEngineersI can fill thisCompliance & DPOSecurityI can fill this
Business case and benefitsConsultedAccountable and ResponsibleConsultedConsultedInformedConsultedInformed
Target architectureConsultedConsultedAccountable and ResponsibleConsultedConsultedConsultedConsulted
Risk rules and procedures in the knowledge baseAccountableConsultedConsultedInformedResponsibleConsultedInformed
DPIA and data protection reviewConsultedConsultedConsultedInformedInformedAccountable and ResponsibleConsulted
Build and integrationInformedConsultedAccountableResponsibleResponsibleInformedConsulted
Pilot testing and QA comparisonAccountableResponsibleConsultedResponsibleResponsibleConsultedInformed
Go-live decisionAccountableResponsibleConsultedResponsibleInformedConsultedConsulted
Run, monitor and improveAccountableResponsibleConsultedConsultedResponsibleConsultedConsulted

Business case and benefits

Head of financial crime / MLRO
C · Consulted
Product owner
A/R · Accountable and Responsible
Solutions architect
C · Consulted
Technical PM
C · Consulted
Engineers
I · Informed
Compliance & DPO
C · Consulted
Security
I · Informed

Target architecture

Head of financial crime / MLRO
C · Consulted
Product owner
C · Consulted
Solutions architect
A/R · Accountable and Responsible
Technical PM
C · Consulted
Engineers
C · Consulted
Compliance & DPO
C · Consulted
Security
C · Consulted

Risk rules and procedures in the knowledge base

Head of financial crime / MLRO
A · Accountable
Product owner
C · Consulted
Solutions architect
C · Consulted
Technical PM
I · Informed
Engineers
R · Responsible
Compliance & DPO
C · Consulted
Security
I · Informed

DPIA and data protection review

Head of financial crime / MLRO
C · Consulted
Product owner
C · Consulted
Solutions architect
C · Consulted
Technical PM
I · Informed
Engineers
I · Informed
Compliance & DPO
A/R · Accountable and Responsible
Security
C · Consulted

Build and integration

Head of financial crime / MLRO
I · Informed
Product owner
C · Consulted
Solutions architect
A · Accountable
Technical PM
R · Responsible
Engineers
R · Responsible
Compliance & DPO
I · Informed
Security
C · Consulted

Pilot testing and QA comparison

Head of financial crime / MLRO
A · Accountable
Product owner
R · Responsible
Solutions architect
C · Consulted
Technical PM
R · Responsible
Engineers
R · Responsible
Compliance & DPO
C · Consulted
Security
I · Informed

Go-live decision

Head of financial crime / MLRO
A · Accountable
Product owner
R · Responsible
Solutions architect
C · Consulted
Technical PM
R · Responsible
Engineers
I · Informed
Compliance & DPO
C · Consulted
Security
C · Consulted

Run, monitor and improve

Head of financial crime / MLRO
A · Accountable
Product owner
R · Responsible
Solutions architect
C · Consulted
Technical PM
C · Consulted
Engineers
R · Responsible
Compliance & DPO
C · Consulted
Security
C · Consulted

R ResponsibleA AccountableC ConsultedI Informed· not involved

Where I'd fit

Option A

Lead the architecture

If there's no architect on the programme, I'd own the design end to end: the target architecture, the integrations with core banking, screening, Companies House and the identity provider, and the gates. I'd work closely with your MLRO and report to your programme board.

Option B

Support your architect

If your partner or your own team already has an architect, I'd take on the document AI, the agents and the screening and Companies House integrations under their lead, and give them a second senior opinion on security, data protection and the evidence trail.

Where this goes wrong

  1. Goes wrong

    The AI quietly becomes the decision-maker, because analysts approve whatever it drafts.

    How the design avoids it

    Rules set the rating, people decide, override and edit rates are watched, and QA samples AI-assisted files at a higher rate.

  2. Goes wrong

    Screening alerts get 'auto-cleared' to hit the efficiency target.

    How the design avoids it

    The agent sets out evidence; only a person clears a match. Thresholds stay owned by financial crime and don't move to make the numbers look good.

  3. Goes wrong

    The procedures in the knowledge base are last year's, so drafts cite the wrong standard.

    How the design avoids it

    Versioned documents with a named owner, citations on every draft, and a re-test whenever procedures or JMLSG guidance change.

  4. Goes wrong

    A helpful drafted message tips off a customer about a suspicion.

    How the design avoids it

    No free text to customers. Messages use approved templates only, and guardrails block wording about holds or reasons.

  5. Goes wrong

    The demo used clean passports. Real small-business files are 40-page scans of share registers.

    How the design avoids it

    Pilot on last quarter's real applications, both journeys, not a curated sample.

On the horizon

Changes already announced or under way that affect this design. More in the UK horizon scan.

  1. From mid-November 2026
    The Companies House identity verification transition for existing directors and PSCs ends. Verification for people who file documents is planned no earlier than November 2027.

    Record what the register showed and when, and treat unexpected changes in a business customer's officers or PSCs as a review trigger.

  2. Late 2026–2027
    Revised JMLSG Part I paragraphs, sent to HM Treasury for ministerial approval in 2026.

    Keep procedures versioned in the knowledge base, so approved changes can be loaded, tested and switched on together.

  3. 2 September 2026 to late 2027
    Certified digital verification services move from version 0.4 to 1.0 of the trust framework, with at least 15 months to uplift. OfDIA is testing a machine-readable DVS register.

    Check your provider's certification and its uplift plan, and plan to check the register automatically when it becomes available.

  4. 2026–2027
    The ICO's code of practice on AI and automated decision-making, required by regulations in force since May 2026.

    Keep the decision log, the explanations and the human review records in a form you could show the ICO as well as the FCA.

  5. Late 2026–2028
    The Cyber Security and Resilience Bill, bringing medium and large managed service providers into regulation.

    Expect your IT, screening and identity suppliers to face new duties, and update supplier assurance and contracts to match.

Questions to ask your partner or vendor

Good answers are specific. Vague answers to any of these are worth following up.

Copy them into your next supplier meeting

  1. Which steps can the agent take without a person, and where is that enforced?
  2. How will we measure draft quality against our own QA results, not a supplier's benchmark?
  3. Does our screening engine now source the UK Sanctions List, and how do we know?
  4. Is our identity provider on the DVS register, and what is its plan for trust framework 1.0?
  5. How do we stop the AI drafting anything that could tip off a customer?
  6. What does it cost to run per thousand applications, retail and small business separately?

Planning something like this?

Whether you need someone to lead the design or to support the architect you already have, let's talk it through.

Sam Naseem
Sam NaseemBirmingham, UK · UK & Europe
Available now