Education · Playbook 42

Admissions and enquiries assistant

Prospective students get accurate answers at any hour, drawn only from the university's approved information, with open-day visits booked and enquiries logged. Admissions staff handle offers, visas and anything personal.

  • Retrieval (RAG)
  • Agents with tools
  • OfS
  • CMA
  • UKVI
  • IAA
  • UK GDPR

At a glance

The problem
Thousands of repeat questions on courses, entry requirements, fees and visas, answered by hand, slowly, and not always the same way
Typical volume
Around 70,000 enquiries a year, about 40% from outside the UK, peaking in Clearing and before visa deadlines
Who's involved
Admissions, international recruitment and the student advice team, marketing and web content owners, faculties, legal and compliance, data protection
Pilot
8–10 weeks after a 3–4 week discovery
Platforms
AWS, Azure, or a sovereign or on-prem stack

An illustrative scenario. The numbers are typical examples, not a client case study. The cloud services and UK rules were checked on 9 November 2026.

The business problem

Prospective students ask the same questions thousands of times a year. Does this course need A level maths? What are the fees for international students, and what else will I pay for? Is accommodation guaranteed? What English test do you accept? Can I work while I study? The answers are on the website, somewhere, spread across course pages, fee tables, PDFs and policy pages that different teams maintain.

The enquiries team answers by email, chat and phone. Replies take days in busy weeks, and two staff can give two different answers. International applicants write at night UK time and wait until morning. In Clearing, every phone line is full. Meanwhile some questions need a person, such as whether a particular qualification will be accepted or what someone's visa options are, and they sit in the same queue as questions about parking.

Accuracy is not just good service. Prospective students are consumers. The CMA's advice to higher education providers says information about courses, costs and terms must be clear, accurate and timely, without leaving out anything material, and since 6 April 2025 the CMA can fine a provider directly for misleading practices. The CMA's 2026 guidance on AI agents says a business is responsible for what its agent says, just as it is for an employee. Visa questions add a second line: giving immigration advice is regulated, and a chatbot is not an adviser.

What AI changes

  • Routine questions are answered in seconds, day and night, from the university's approved and current published information. Every answer links to the page it came from.
  • Fees, entry requirements and course facts come from the course catalogue through a tool and are quoted exactly, not paraphrased by a model.
  • Visitors can book an open day, campus tour or call-back, and their enquiry is logged in the student CRM with a summary and their stated preferences.
  • Questions that need a person, such as offers, qualification equivalence, individual visa circumstances, disability support and complaints, are handed to the right team with the conversation attached.
  • Content owners are told when their pages contradict the catalogue or have passed their review date, before a wrong answer is given.
  • What doesn't change: people make every admissions decision. The assistant never makes, predicts or implies an offer, and never gives advice on someone's immigration situation.

How success is measured

Agree these, and measure the baseline, before anything is built. Example targets are typical, not promises.

Answer accuracy

A weekly audited sample checked against the source page. Material errors on fees, entry requirements or visas are counted separately.

ExampleAbove 98%, and no material errors left unfixed

Answered at first contact

Share of routine enquiries resolved without a person, with no repeat contact on the same question within a week.

Example60–70% of routine enquiries

Time to a person

How long a handed-off enquiry waits for a member of staff.

ExampleUnder one working day; same day in Clearing

Out-of-scope handling

A fixed test set of offer, grade-prediction and personal visa questions, run before every change. Every one must be handed off, never answered.

Example100%, every release

Content in date

Share of source pages within their review date and matching the course catalogue.

Example100% for the current cycle

Enquiry to application

Open-day bookings and applications from people who used the assistant, compared with last cycle.

ExampleMeasured against last cycle

UK regulation and controls

Cross-sector rules are on the UK regulation map.

  • OfSCondition C1 (consumer protection law) and the proposed condition C6 (treating students fairly)

    C1 requires providers to show they have given due regard to guidance on consumer protection law in their policies, procedures and terms, which covers prospective students. The OfS consulted from 16 April to 9 July 2026 on a new condition C6, replacing C1 and C3, which would require clear, accurate and comprehensive information for prospective students. The assistant answers only from approved, current content, and its answers are logged so the university can show what each person was told.

  • CMAConsumer law advice for higher education providers (updated May 2023) and the DMCC Act 2024

    Misleading information and the omission of material information, such as additional course costs, are unfair commercial practices. Since 6 April 2025 the CMA can enforce directly, with fines of up to 10% of global turnover. Fees and costs come from the fee tables through a tool and are quoted exactly, with any additional costs the page lists.

  • CMAComplying with consumer law when using AI agents (March 2026, updated October 2026)

    The university is responsible for its assistant as it would be for a member of staff, including errors. People are told they are talking to an AI, it doesn't overstate what it can do, and a person is one click away. Monitoring and escalation are part of the design, not an afterthought.

  • Immigration Advice Authority and Home OfficePart V of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999

    Giving immigration advice is regulated. Universities can advise their own students and prospective students under an exemption for educational institutions, through trained advisers following the IAA's Code of Standards. The assistant isn't one of them. It gives general published information, links to GOV.UK, and hands anything about a person's own circumstances to the university's international student advisers.

  • Home Office (UKVI)Student sponsor guidance (updated 7 April 2026)

    Sponsors must keep visa refusal rates below 5% and enrolment at 95% or more, and those using recruitment agents must commit to the Agent Quality Framework and record agent details on the CAS. The assistant never assesses visa eligibility or promises a CAS, gives every applicant the same published pre-arrival information, and records in the CRM when an enquirer says an agent is helping them.

  • UUK and GuildHEFair Admissions Code of Practice (updated October 2025)

    For signatories, admissions must be fair, transparent and consistent. The assistant describes entry requirements and contextual offers only as published, never says what grades will be accepted for an individual, and refers qualification questions to admissions staff.

  • ICOUK GDPR, PECR and the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025

    Many applicants are 17, so treat the chat as a service children will use: collect only what's needed, no profiling by default, and clear privacy information. Marketing emails after an enquiry need consent, recorded in the CRM. Chat logs get a retention period, and the contract stops providers training models on them.

The solution

Showing AWSAzuresovereign / on-prem services. Switch with the toggle; every diagram and table on this page follows it.

Admissions and enquiries assistant: reference architecture
  1. 01Channels

    • Website and course page chat
    • Enquiry email
    • Applicant portal
  2. 02Intake

    • API GatewayAPI ManagementKong, or your existing API gatewayChat API
    • Amazon SESLogic Apps email connectorYour existing mail serverInbound email
    • Amazon TranslateAzure Translator in Foundry ToolsAn open-weight model served with vLLMTranslation (optional)
  3. 03Intelligence

    • Bedrock Knowledge BasesFoundry IQ (Azure AI Search)OpenSearch, or PostgreSQL with pgvectorApproved content index
    • Agent
      Bedrock AgentCoreFoundry Agent ServiceLangGraph on Kubernetes, with open-weight models via vLLMEnquiries assistant
    • Bedrock GuardrailsFoundry guardrails (Azure AI Content Safety)NeMo Guardrails, Llama GuardGuardrails
  4. 04Orchestration

    • Step FunctionsLogic Apps / Durable FunctionsTemporal, or n8nBooking and handoff workflow
    • EventBridge + SQSEvent Grid + Service BusApache Kafka or RabbitMQEvents and queues
  5. 05Systems of record

    • Course catalogue and fee tables
    • Student CRM
    • Events and open-day booking
  6. 06People

    • Person
      Admissions team
    • Person
      International student advisers
    • Person
      Content owners in faculties
  • Cloud or platform service (AWSAzuresovereign / on-prem)
  • AI agent
  • A person decides
  • Your existing systems
  • Outside your organisation

Components, side by side

Admissions and enquiries assistant: components on AWS, Azure and a sovereign or on-prem stack
LayerAWSAzureSovereign / on-prem
Intake: chat, email, portalOne assistant behind every channel, so every channel gives the same answer.API Gateway, Amazon SESAPI Management, Logic Apps connectorsKong or your existing API gateway; your mail server
Reasoning and answersBoth clouds offer a choice of models, including Claude. On-prem and sovereign options run open-weight models.Amazon BedrockMicrosoft FoundryOpen-weight models served with vLLM on your own GPUs, or IONOS AI Model Hub
Approved content (retrieval)Only approved pages for the current cycle, each with an owner, an academic year and a review date. Old prospectuses and last year's pages stay out.Bedrock Knowledge BasesFoundry IQ, built on Azure AI SearchOpenSearch, or PostgreSQL with pgvector
Course facts and feesFacts that matter legally come from structured data and are quoted exactly, with the link.Lambda tools calling the course catalogue APIAzure Functions tools calling the course catalogue APITools on Kubernetes calling the course catalogue API
Agent runtimeThe original Bedrock Agents closed to new customers on 30 July 2026; new builds use AgentCore.Amazon Bedrock AgentCoreFoundry Agent ServiceAn open-source agent framework (e.g. LangGraph) on Kubernetes
Agent permissionsThe assistant's tools can book and log. They have no route to offers, applications or student records.Amazon Verified Permissions, IAMEntra ID app roles and API Management policiesOpen Policy Agent, or Keycloak authorisation services
Translation (optional)Translated answers say the English page is the authoritative version and link to it.Amazon TranslateAzure Translator in Foundry ToolsAn open-weight model served with vLLM
WorkflowHandoffs, bookings and confirmations, with retries that never double-book.AWS Step FunctionsLogic Apps or Durable FunctionsTemporal, or n8n
Events and messagingAmazon Pinpoint reached end of support on 30 October 2026; use AWS End User Messaging.Amazon EventBridge, SQS; AWS End User Messaging for SMSEvent Grid, Service Bus; Azure Communication ServicesApache Kafka or RabbitMQ; your SMS provider
Link to the CRM and booking systemReuse the integration layer you have. Don't buy a new one for this.API Gateway, plus your existing integration platform if you have oneAPI Management, plus your existing integration platform if you have oneKong or your existing API gateway, plus your existing integration platform if you have one
Human handoffStaff pick up handoffs where they already work, with the conversation attached.In the admissions team's existing CRM queueIn the admissions team's existing CRM queueIn the admissions team's existing CRM queue
GuardrailsDenied topics for offers, grade predictions and personal immigration advice, backed by the handoff rules in the workflow.Bedrock GuardrailsFoundry guardrails (Azure AI Content Safety)Open-source guardrails (e.g. NeMo Guardrails, Llama Guard)
Identity, keys, data protectionIAM Identity Center, KMS, MacieEntra ID, Key Vault, PurviewKeycloak or your existing Active Directory; OpenBao or HashiCorp Vault; an HSM
Monitoring and auditLog every answer with the sources it used, so you can show what someone was told.CloudWatch, CloudTrailAzure Monitor, Log AnalyticsPrometheus, Grafana, OpenTelemetry
UK data residencyIONOS AI Model Hub runs in German data centres: EU, not UK, residency.eu-west-2 (London)UK South / UK WestYour own UK data centre, or a UK or EU provider

On a phone, the table shows the platform you pick. Sovereign / on-prem means open, portable components you can run in your own data centre or with a UK or European provider; IONOS is shown as one example, and others exist. What sovereign cloud means →

Hybrid and on-prem

Many organisations keep core systems and sensitive data on their own servers. This is how the same design works across both.

Stays on-prem

The student records and admissions system and the course catalogue database often run on the university's own servers, and they stay there. The student CRM and the events system stay wherever they run today.

Uses cloud AI

The approved content index, the assistant and the guardrails run in a UK cloud region, or on the university's own GPUs with open-weight models. Only published content is indexed, so the index itself holds nothing confidential.

How they connect

Through the API layer, over a private link such as AWS Direct Connect or Azure ExpressRoute. The assistant reads the catalogue and writes enquiries and bookings; it has no connection to the admissions system at all.

If the link drops

The chat says it can't answer right now and offers the enquiry form and the relevant published pages. Enquiries queue and reach staff as they did before the assistant. Nothing is answered from a stale copy.

The agents

What each agent may do through its tools, what it may not, and where a person signs off. The limits are enforced by the platform, not the prompt.

Enquiries assistant

May do

  • Search approved published content for the current admissions cycle
  • Look up course facts, entry requirements and fees in the course catalogue
  • Book an open day, campus tour or call-back
  • Create or update an enquiry in the student CRM, with consent recorded
  • Hand an enquiry to admissions, international advisers or the disability team, with a summary
  • Send a confirmation email for a booking or handoff

May not do

  • Make, predict or imply an offer, or say whether grades or qualifications will be accepted
  • Advise on a person's own immigration situation or visa eligibility
  • Quote a fee, discount or scholarship that isn't in the catalogue
  • See or change applications, admissions decisions or student records
  • Add anyone to marketing without their consent

Where a person signs offAdmissions staff make every decision about an applicant, and only the university's trained advisers give immigration advice. The assistant's tools and data access are enforced by the platform's identity and policy controls, not by instructions in a prompt.

Content check

May do

  • Compare published pages with the course catalogue and fee tables
  • Flag pages past their review date, or that contradict the catalogue, to their owner
  • Report the questions the assistant couldn't answer, so owners can fill the gaps

May not do

  • Edit or publish any page
  • Add content to the index without the owner's approval

Where a person signs offA named content owner approves every page before it enters the index, and the web team publishes changes through the usual process.

Middleware and integration

The course catalogue is the single source of truth for course facts and fees. The assistant reads it through the API layer; web pages, the prospectus and the assistant all draw from the same data, so they can't drift apart.

Bookings and enquiries are events. If the CRM or the events system is slow or down, they wait safely on the queue. Every message carries an ID, so a retry never creates a duplicate enquiry or a double booking.

The assistant has no connection to the admissions system. That's a design choice, not a limitation: it can't reveal or imply an application outcome because it can't see one.

Process and people

  • A named owner for every page in the index, with a review date tied to the admissions cycle.
  • A list of topics that always go to a person, agreed with admissions, the international advisers and legal, and tested before every release.
  • A weekly accuracy review of a sample of answers, including translated ones, with fixes made in the source page, not in the prompt.
  • Handoff rules and response times for each team, with cover planned for Clearing and visa deadlines.
  • Advisers and admissions staff trained on what the assistant says and doesn't say, so their answers line up.
  • A clear route for complaints about information given, with the logged conversation available to the person handling it.

Delivery plan

  1. 3–4 weeks

    Discovery

    Inventory the content and its owners, measure enquiry volumes and repeat questions, agree the always-to-a-person topics, and check the catalogue API.

  2. Gate · must be true to passContent owners named, handoff topics agreed with legal and the international advisers, DPIA started, baseline measured.

  3. 8–10 weeks

    Pilot

    Staff-assist first: the assistant drafts email replies that staff check and send. Then public chat for postgraduate taught courses only, outside any peak period.

  4. Gate · must be true to passAccuracy above the agreed level, every out-of-scope test handed off, and admissions and compliance sign-off.

  5. 4–6 weeks

    Production

    Public chat for undergraduate and postgraduate enquiries, with booking and CRM logging, monitoring, support and a rollback plan.

  6. Gate · must be true to passMonitoring, handoff cover, rollback plan and staff training in place, and not launched in Clearing.

  7. Ongoing

    Scale

    Add languages for priority international markets, then support during Clearing with clear routes to a person.

  8. Gate · must be true to passEach new language or season passes the same accuracy and out-of-scope tests.

Roles and RACI

Who is responsible, accountable, consulted and informed, by activity
ActivityDirector of admissionsProduct ownerSolutions architectI can fill thisTechnical PMI can fill thisEngineersI can fill thisLegal, compliance & DPOSecurityI can fill this
Business case and benefitsAccountableResponsibleConsultedConsultedInformedConsultedInformed
Handoff topics and scopeAccountableResponsibleConsultedInformedInformedResponsibleInformed
Target architectureInformedConsultedAccountable and ResponsibleConsultedConsultedConsultedConsulted
DPIA and consumer law reviewConsultedConsultedConsultedInformedInformedAccountable and ResponsibleConsulted
Build and integrationInformedConsultedAccountableResponsibleResponsibleInformedConsulted
Accuracy and out-of-scope testingConsultedAccountableResponsibleConsultedResponsibleConsultedInformed
Go-live decisionAccountableResponsibleConsultedResponsibleInformedConsultedConsulted
Run, monitor and improveInformedAccountableConsultedConsultedResponsibleConsultedConsulted

Business case and benefits

Director of admissions
A · Accountable
Product owner
R · Responsible
Solutions architect
C · Consulted
Technical PM
C · Consulted
Engineers
I · Informed
Legal, compliance & DPO
C · Consulted
Security
I · Informed

Handoff topics and scope

Director of admissions
A · Accountable
Product owner
R · Responsible
Solutions architect
C · Consulted
Technical PM
I · Informed
Engineers
I · Informed
Legal, compliance & DPO
R · Responsible
Security
I · Informed

Target architecture

Director of admissions
I · Informed
Product owner
C · Consulted
Solutions architect
A/R · Accountable and Responsible
Technical PM
C · Consulted
Engineers
C · Consulted
Legal, compliance & DPO
C · Consulted
Security
C · Consulted

DPIA and consumer law review

Director of admissions
C · Consulted
Product owner
C · Consulted
Solutions architect
C · Consulted
Technical PM
I · Informed
Engineers
I · Informed
Legal, compliance & DPO
A/R · Accountable and Responsible
Security
C · Consulted

Build and integration

Director of admissions
I · Informed
Product owner
C · Consulted
Solutions architect
A · Accountable
Technical PM
R · Responsible
Engineers
R · Responsible
Legal, compliance & DPO
I · Informed
Security
C · Consulted

Accuracy and out-of-scope testing

Director of admissions
C · Consulted
Product owner
A · Accountable
Solutions architect
R · Responsible
Technical PM
C · Consulted
Engineers
R · Responsible
Legal, compliance & DPO
C · Consulted
Security
I · Informed

Go-live decision

Director of admissions
A · Accountable
Product owner
R · Responsible
Solutions architect
C · Consulted
Technical PM
R · Responsible
Engineers
I · Informed
Legal, compliance & DPO
C · Consulted
Security
C · Consulted

Run, monitor and improve

Director of admissions
I · Informed
Product owner
A · Accountable
Solutions architect
C · Consulted
Technical PM
C · Consulted
Engineers
R · Responsible
Legal, compliance & DPO
C · Consulted
Security
C · Consulted

R ResponsibleA AccountableC ConsultedI Informed· not involved

Where I'd fit

Option A

Lead the architecture

If there's no architect on the programme, I'd own the design end to end: the approved content index, the catalogue and CRM integrations, the assistant's permissions, and the gates. I'd report to your programme board, and I'd make sure the line on offers and immigration advice is enforced by the platform, not left to a prompt.

Option B

Support your architect

If your partner or your own team already has an architect, I'd take on the retrieval, the agent tools and the CRM and booking integration under their lead, and give them a second senior opinion on the rest, especially security and data protection.

Where this goes wrong

  1. Goes wrong

    Everything on the website goes into the index, including last year's fees and an old prospectus PDF.

    How the design avoids it

    Only approved pages for the current cycle, each with an owner and a review date. Anything out of date leaves the index automatically.

  2. Goes wrong

    Someone asks 'will I get in with BBC?' and the assistant gives a hopeful answer.

    How the design avoids it

    Offer and grade questions are denied topics, backed by handoff rules in the workflow and tested before every release.

  3. Goes wrong

    A visa answer is confident, specific and wrong for that person.

    How the design avoids it

    General published information and GOV.UK links only. Anything about someone's own circumstances goes to a trained adviser.

  4. Goes wrong

    The model paraphrases a fee and changes its meaning.

    How the design avoids it

    Fees and entry requirements come from the catalogue through a tool and are quoted exactly, with the link.

  5. Goes wrong

    It launches in Clearing week, with nobody free to take handoffs.

    How the design avoids it

    Launch outside peak periods, plan handoff cover first, and keep Clearing offers with people on the phone.

On the horizon

Changes already announced or under way that affect this design. More in the UK horizon scan.

  1. Expected late 2026
    The OfS decision on condition C6, treating students fairly, which would replace C1 and C3. The proposal brings the fairness duty in on publication, and a single student protection webpage three months later.

    Keep the logs of what the assistant told each person, and make the content owners' review process something you could show the OfS.

  2. 1 January 2027
    The Graduate route falls to 18 months for bachelor's and master's graduates applying from that date. PhD graduates keep three years.

    Give visa content effective dates, so the assistant gives today's applicants the rule that will apply when they graduate, and review it with the international advisers.

  3. 1 June 2027
    The Basic Compliance Assessment course completion threshold rises from 85% to 90%, and red, amber and green ratings are due to be published in summer 2027.

    Keep pre-arrival information consistent and logged, so applicants arrive with the right expectations.

  4. From 1 August 2028 (draft legislation)
    An international student levy of £925 per international student per year for providers in England, after the first 220 students.

    If fees change, change them once in the catalogue. Nothing about fees should live in a prompt.

  5. 2026–2027
    The ICO's code of practice on AI and automated decision-making, required by regulations in force since May 2026.

    Keep the answer logs, the handoff records and the scope decisions in a form you could show the ICO.

Questions to ask your partner or vendor

Good answers are specific. Vague answers to any of these are worth following up.

Copy them into your next supplier meeting

  1. Which topics can the assistant never answer, and where in the platform is that enforced?
  2. How does a page get into the index, and how does an out-of-date page get out?
  3. Where do fees and entry requirements come from: the catalogue, or the model's reading of a web page?
  4. Can we show exactly what the assistant told a particular applicant, and from which source?
  5. What happens to an enquiry when the CRM or the AI service is down?
  6. Where are chat logs stored, for how long, and are they used to train anyone's model?

Planning something like this?

Whether you need someone to lead the design or to support the architect you already have, let's talk it through.

Sam Naseem
Sam NaseemBirmingham, UK · UK & Europe
Available now